Legal Opinion

In re Forbes

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided February 11, 1904No. 8,338PublishedCited by 20 opinions

In Bankruptcy.

1Opinion of the Court

LOWETL, District Judge.

This is a petition in the usual form filed by one partner to bring his firm and his copartner into bankruptcy. The copartner, being served, has, by his answer, denied “that he has committed the act of bankruptcy alleged in the petition, or that he is insolvent,” and has also denied that the partnership existed at the date of the petition or at any other date, tie has claimed a jury trial. The court has to consider if a jury trial can be had, and, should it be ordered, what issues are to be submitted to the jury.

Some difficulties arising in the bankruptcy of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Medsker v. BonebrakeSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. In re MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1899
  3. Vaccaro v. Security BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
  4. In re WilcoxDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1899
  5. Ludowici Roofing Tile Co. v. Pennsylvania Inst. for Instruction of the BlindCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1903

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Liberty Nat. Bank of Roanoke, Va. v. BearSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Myers v. International Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Tumlin v. BryanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1908
  4. In re BertenshawCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  5. Horner v. HamnerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1918

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API