Legal Opinion

Walendzinski v. Renico

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided January 31, 2005No. CIV. 04-0032PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

GADOLA, District Judge.

Chester Walendzinski, (“petitioner”), presently confined at the St. Louis Correctional Facility in St. Louis, Michigan, seeks the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In his application, filed through counsel, petitioner challenges his conviction of first-degree felony murder under M.C.L. 750.316 and conspiracy to commit unarmed robbery under M.C.L. 750.530. For the reasons stated below, the Court will deny the application for writ of habeas corpus.

I. Background

Petitioner was…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Long v. StovallDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
  2. Hyatt v. WeberDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2006
  3. Martin v. BurgessDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
  4. Smith v. KingDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
  5. Zimmerman v. DavisDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API