Legal Opinion

People v. Hill

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 28, 1970No. Docket 6,752PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant’s jury trial on a charge of armed robbery * resulted in his conviction of the offense charged. He was sentenced, his motion for a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence was denied, and he appeals. The appeal raises two issues:

1. Should the trial court have granted defendant’s motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence ?

2. Did defendant have adequate representation?

The grant of a motion for new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence is discretionary, People v. Bauman (1952), 332 Mich 198. Appellate relief from a denial of a motion for new trial on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. KeiswetterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. People v. BaumanMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  3. People v. DavisonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. People v. WolschonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Moldovan v. Allis Chalmers Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. People v. WhiteMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. People v. VaughnMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Meyer v. HeidtMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Moldovan v. Allis Chalmers Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API