People v. Hill
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Defendant’s jury trial on a charge of armed robbery * resulted in his conviction of the offense charged. He was sentenced, his motion for a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence was denied, and he appeals. The appeal raises two issues:
1. Should the trial court have granted defendant’s motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence ?
2. Did defendant have adequate representation?
The grant of a motion for new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence is discretionary, People v. Bauman (1952), 332 Mich 198. Appellate relief from a denial of a motion for new trial on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. KeiswetterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
- People v. BaumanMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- People v. DavisonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- People v. WolschonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
3Cited by8 opinions
- Moldovan v. Allis Chalmers Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. WhiteMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- People v. VaughnMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Meyer v. HeidtMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Moldovan v. Allis Chalmers Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.