Legal Opinion

Poorman v. Muncy & Bartle Painting

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 13, 1983No. AO-258PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

433 So.2d 1371 (1983)

Wayne POORMAN, Appellant,

v.

MUNCY & BARTLE PAINTING and Reliance Insurance Company, Appellees.

No. AO-258.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 13, 1983.

David B. Kesler, St. Petersburg, for appellant.

John H. Thompson, IV, of Earle & Thompson, St. Petersburg, for appellees.

SHIVERS, Judge.

In this workers' compensation case, Poorman appeals the order of the deputy commissioner which denies compensability for an injury to claimant's right knee. We agree with appellant that the findings of the deputy commissioner are not supported by competent, substantial…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sanford v. AP Clark MotorsSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  2. Buro v. Dino's Southland MeatsSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  3. Rouse v. Wyldwood Tropical NurseryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Kelly v. Florida Atlantic UniversityDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. McNew v. S. SOUTHERN INTERMODAL LOGISTICSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Curry v. Miami Dolphins, Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Chavarria v. Selugal Clothing, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  3. McCabe v. Bechtel Power Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  4. Bray v. Electronic Door-Lift, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  5. Philpot v. City of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API