Legal Opinion

Ehret v. Ringler

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1911Published

Application for the appointment of a receiver.

1Opinion of the CourtGoff, J.

The plaintiffs,- Ehret and Trommer, are executors of the estate of William G. Ringler, deceased, and in that capacity are owners of one-half, or approximately one-half, of the stock of defendant corporation. They have applied to the court under subdivision 3 of section 305 of ■the General Corporation Law for the appointment of a receiver to preserve the corporate assets, alleging that defendant company has “ no officer empowered to hold the same.” The defendant was incorporated in this State in 1899 for the purpose of conducting a brewery. It has an -authorized and paid in capital -stock of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Stearns v. . MarrNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Hull v. ThomasNew York Court of Chancery · 1838
  3. Zeltner v. Henry Zeltner Brewing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. Constant v. Rector, Wardens & Vestry of St. Albans ChurchNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1872
  5. Zeltner v. Henry Zeltner Brewing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API