Legal Opinion
Prevatt v. the Federal Land Bank
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided October 20, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.
The appeal brings for review order denying motion to dis'miss bill of complaint.
The appellant presents four questions for our consideration as follows:
“1. Where it appears from the bill of complaint that the original mortgagors have parted with their interest in the mortgaged premises, can the mortgage be foreclosed against them as sole defendants?”
“2. Where a mortgage is' executed to secure a note executed by the mortgagors and another as co-makers, is the co-maker of the note a necessary party defendant to the foreclosure ?”
“3. Where the mortgagors ‘and/or their successors in interest’…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Younghusband v. Fort Pierce Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930
- Delbeck Investment Co. v. RaffSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Van Sant v. Duval Cattle Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
3Cited by3 opinions
- Degge v. First State Bank of EustisSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Cukierman v. BankAtlanticDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Hobbs v. FLORIDA FIRST NAT. BANKDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985