Misseritti v. Mark IV Construction Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Green and Balio, JJ. (dissenting in part).
We respectfully dissent in part. Although we agree with the majority that Mark IV Construction Co. was entitled to summary judgment on its third-party complaint, we conclude that Supreme Court properly granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action.
Plaintiff’s decedent, a mason employed by B.A. Masons, Inc., assisted in the dismantling of scaffolding and the cleaning up of debris around a 22-foot high concrete block wall. A strong gust of wind blew over the free standing and unbraced wall, and a portion of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Rodriguez v. Margaret Tietz Center for Nursing Care, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Staples v. Town of AmherstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Oden v. Chemung County Industrial Development AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.