Legal Opinion

United States v. Kiyoko Ito

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 14, 2012No. 10-56409UnpublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Glenn and Kiyoko Ito appeal the district court’s dismissal without prejudice of the government’s civil forfeiture action. We vacate the district court’s dismissal be cause it was based on an erroneous understanding of the law.

“When ruling on a motion to dismiss without prejudice, the district court must determine whether the defendant will suffer some plain legal prejudice as a result of the dismissal.” Westlands Water Dist. v. United States, 100 F.3d 94, 96 (9th Cir.1996). The district court abuses its discretion when it bases its decision on an erroneous view of the law. See id.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. James Miles v. State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Cadkin v. LooseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Oscar v. Alaska Department of Education & Early DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Thirty-Two Thousand Eight Hundred Twenty Dollars & Fifty-Six Cents ($32,820.56) in United States CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. Thirty-Two Thousand Eight Hundred Twenty Dollars & Fifty-Six Cents ($32,820.56) in United States CurrencyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2015
  3. Breaking Code Silence v. PapciakDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
  4. Coupa Software Incorporated v. DCR Workforce, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2023
  5. E-Z Living LLC v. A10 Capital, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API