Byrd v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CARR, Presiding Judge.
The accused was convicted on a charge of larceny of a cow, the personal property of Ray Jackson.
The only questions which merit any comment by us are the actions of the court in refusing the general affirmative charge tendered by the defendant and the refusal to grant the motion for a new trial.
Our review of the sufficiency of the evidence is also invited by defendant’s motion to exclude all of the State’s evidence. Hendricks v. State, 34 Ala.App. 502, 41 So.2d 420; Brooks v. State, 34 Ala.App. 275, 38 So.2d 744.
The State anchored the prosecution on circumstantial…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Hargrove v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- Lee v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
- Hannon v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
- Graham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
- Parker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
- Byrd v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954