Legal Opinion

Iva Ikuko Toguri D'Aquino v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 17, 1951No. 12383_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

A petition for rehearing herein has restated the arguments previously urged. Because we think the petition discloses some misapprehension as to what we endeavored to say in the opinion, we desire to make note of the contentions now made upon two points.

The petition says that our opinion has failed to arrive at proper conclusions as to the effect of appellant’s apprehension and detention by the military authorities in Japan. It is said that we went astray in two directions: first, in holding that the detention did not render inadmissible in evidence the appellant’s statement made to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stillman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  2. HIROTA v. MacARTHUR, GENERAL OF THE ARMY, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Lewis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. ProvooDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1955
  2. Gene Z. Hanrahan v. United States of America, William T. P. Shea v. United States of America, John W. Tynan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  3. Rafael Quintana Sanchez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  4. Carlin Constantine Venus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  5. State v. GannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API