Veronee v. Charleston Consol. Ry. & Lighting Co.

(dissenting) : While I agree in the main with the disposition by Mr. Justice Graydon of the various exceptions in this case, I do not deem it necessary to' discuss any other point in the appeal than the tenth exception. I think that the defendant was clearly entitled to a charge of his second request, as it was presented, and that its modification was reversible error.

The request was this: “I charge you that the plaintiff cannot stupidly, recklessly, or even carelessly obey an order ■of a superior, requiring him to do an obviously dangerous act, and if plaintiff knows, or as a reasonably…