Legal Opinion
Doe v. Holy See (State of Vatican City)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 30, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from an order and judgment (one document) of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Evelyn Frazee, J.), entered June 24, 2003. The order and judgment granted the motion of defendants Diocese of Rochester, Matthew H. Clark, Bishop of Rochester, and St. John’s The Evangelist Church to dismiss the complaint against them and denied plaintiffs cross motion for leave to amend the complaint.
It is hereby ordered that the order and judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for injuries arising…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jordan v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Doe v. HartzDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1999
- Zoe G. v. Frederick F. G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Langford v. Roman Catholic DioceseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Doe v. Norwich Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Doe v. Holy SeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Doe v. Holy SeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Doe v. Holy SeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Zumpano v. QuinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004