Legal Opinion

Tergeson v. Robinson Manufacturing Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1908No. 6964PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Honorable J. A. Coleman, judge pro tempore, entered March £S, 1907, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for personal injuries sustained by an employee while operating a planing machine.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

This action which has heretofore been in this court (43 Wash. 298, 86 Pac. 578) was commenced by Pearl Tergeson, by Soren Tergeson, his guardian ad litem, against Robinson Manufacturing Company, ‘a corporation, to recover damages for personal injuries. From a judgment in plaintiff’s favor, the defendant has appealed.

The respondent, an employee of appellant, was injured on March 2, 1905, while running lattice through a sticker or planing machine, which machine was provided with top, bottom, and side-heads, equipped with knives. The lattice material was passed through feed rolls to the lower…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kirby v. Wheeler-Osgood Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Tergeson v. Robinson Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Zukowsky v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Burge v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Jensen v. Shaw Show Case Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Neeley v. BockWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Myers-Parr Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API