Legal Opinion
Wall v. Rolls-Royce of America, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 5, 1925No. 3265PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.
The appellant, Howard Wall, doing business under the name Rolls-Royce Tube Company, assigns for error the action óf the Court below in enjoining him from using the name Rolls-Royce in carrying on his individual business. From the record and statement made at bar it appears Rolls-Royce is a hyphenated combination of the family names of the two founders of the British Corporation, Rolls-Royce, Limited; that said firm manufactured automobiles and aeroplanes and parts thereof; that by reason of the high standard of its product and the volume and spread of its trade the…
2Cited by80 opinions
- Yale Electric Corporation v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Scott Paper Company, a Corporation v. Scott's Liquid Gold, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. SahatiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- The Fleischmann Distilling Corp., a Corporation, Etc. v. Maier Brewing Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- World Carpets, Inc. v. Dick Littrell's New World Carpets, Joseph E. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.