Cinfel v. Malena
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court for Stanton county. Re-plevin action, commenced originally in county court. Tried below before Graves, J. Judgment for plaintiffs.
1Opinion of the Court
Barnes, C.
This action was originally commenced in the county court of Stanton county, by W. J. Malena, Frank Trojan and Joseph Kabas, who claimed to be joint owners of a *96certain threshing machine and horse power, to recover the immediate possession thereof from Frank Cinfel and others. Prom a judgment of the county court an appeal was taken to the district court, and the cause was there tried to a jury. The result of the trial was a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, and judgment was entered thereon. From that judgment the defendant Prank Cinfel prosecutes error to this court.
The claims of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Louthain v. FitzerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Teeple v. DickeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Hadley v. HadleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by4 opinions
- Schaeffer v. FrakesNebraska Supreme Court · 2023
- Smith v. WeissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Richardson v. WoodSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1915
- Shoaff v. GageDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1958