Dinken v. Weininger
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
The papers before me are in conflict in some respects, but for present purposes I have come to the following factual conclusions: Pete and Cipiate are pedigreed and registered French poodles. Plaintiff is the owner of Pete. Defendant is the owner of Cipiate. Plaintiff and defendant agreed to mate their poodles, and that plaintiff would receive one dog, a female, from the likely litter. The animals Avere duly mated and a litter of three puppies Avas born, one of which was a male, the others females. The male died. Plaintiff demanded a female pup from defendant in pursuance of their agreement…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Palmer v. . De WittNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Adrian v. UntermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Adrian v. UntermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Harry Rogers Theatrical Enterprises Inc. v. ComstockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- Goddard v. GladstoneNew York Supreme Court · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Shapiro v. CohnNew York Supreme Court · 1958