Goldsworthy v. Boyle
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 303, Jan. T., 1896, by-plaintiffs, from order of C. P. Columbia Co., Sept. T., 1895,. No. 4, dismissing bill in equity. ‘ Bill in equity for an injunction.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 303, Jan. T., 1896, by-plaintiffs, from order of C. P. Columbia Co., Sept. T., 1895,. No. 4, dismissing bill in equity. ‘ Bill in equity for an injunction. The facts appear by the opinion of the court by Metzger, P. J.?. of the 29th judicial district, specially presiding, which was as-follows: The bill in this case substantially alleges: 1st. That by virtue of the act of 27th of April, 1869, P. L. 1228, an election was held on the 19th of February, 1895, to elect one person director of the poor in pursuance of the authority of said act. 2d. That the township of Conyngham for…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
All the material facts of this somewhat novel proceeding in equity, together with the reasons which prompted the dissolution of the preliminary injunction and dismissal of the bill, are fully set forth in the opinion of the learned president of the 29th judicial district, who specially presided at the hearing, and need not be repeated. We are satisfied from an examination of the record that the findings of fact as well as the legal conclusions drawn therefrom are substantially correct, and fully warranted the dismissal of the bill. Further discussion of the questions involved would…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Ekern v. McGovernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Cella v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Palermo v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Williams's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.