Legal Opinion
Siegel v. Holson Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 16, 1991No. 91 Civ. 1739 (JFK)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KEENAN, District Judge:
Before the Court is the motion of defendant Thomas E. Hoffmeister (“Hoffmeis-ter”) for an order, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2), dismissing the complaint as to him for lack of personal jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth below, Hoffmeister’s motion is granted.
Facts
Plaintiff Irving A. Siegel brought this diversity action against The Holson Company (“Holson”), and Hoffmeister, its president, for tortious interference with plaintiff’s contractual relationship and prospec tive business relations with his employer, Strauss’, Inc. (“Strauss’”).…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Marine Midland Bank, N.A. v. James W. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Bruce Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- International Healthcare Exchange, Inc. v. Global Healthcare Exchange, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Karabu Corp. v. GitnerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- North Fork Partners Investment Holdings, LLC v. BrackenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Sound Around Inc. v. Shenzhen Keenray Innovations LimitedDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023