International Ass'n of Fire Fighters, Local No. 279 v. Civil Service Commission of the Fire Department
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Concurrence
THOMAS, Chief Justice,
with whom ROSE, Justice, joins, specially concurring.
I agree with the result reached in the majority opinion of the court. For myself, however, I would ground the affirmance strictly upon the proposition that the union and its representative have no standing to assert that the rule amendment unconstitutionally impairs their labor contract.
A fundamental aspect of the doctrine of standing is that those who press an issue *1298must allege “a personal stake in the outcome of the controversy.” Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 204, 82 S.Ct. 691, 703, 7 L.Ed.2d 663 (1962); Warth v.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Poe v. UllmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.