Legal Opinion · Dissent

Homewood City Board of Education v. Alabama State Tenure Commission

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 5, 1997No. 2961079Published

1DissentCrawley, Judge

The mere passage of time will not suffice to bar a claim on the ground of laches. Ex parte Johnson, 485 So.2d 1098 (Ala.1986). The party asserting the defense of laches bears the burden of proving not only that the delay was unreasonable but also that the delay caused prejudice. Chafian v. Alabama Board of Chiropractic Examiners, 647 So.2d 759 (Ala.Civ.App.1994):

“Classic elements of undue prejudice, for purposes of determining the applicability of the doctrine of laches, include the unavailability of witnesses, changed personnel, and the loss of pertinent records.”

Ex parte Grubbs, 542 So.2d…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GrubbsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Alabama, Etc. v. Board of School Com'rsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  3. Ex Parte JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Cullman City Board of Education v. BuchanonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1969
  5. Chafian v. BD. OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERSCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API