Legal Opinion
Bitah v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided September 18, 2025No. 3:24-cv-08067Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Lula Ben Bitah, No. CV-24-08067-PCT-DJH 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Plaintiff Lula Ben Bitah (“Ms. Bitah” or “Plaintiff”) has filed an administrative 16 appeal challenging the denial of her relocation benefits under
25 C.F.R. § 700.147. 17 (Doc. 1). Plaintiff filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, arguing that the decision of the 18 Independent Hearing Officer (“IHO”) is unsupported by substantial evidence and is 19 arbitrary, capricious and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Shaibi v. BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Nettie Marie Jones v. Edwin H. Weibrecht, Jr., Edwin H. Weibrecht, Jr. v. Nettie Marie JonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- The Hopi Tribe, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. The Navajo Tribe, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.