Legal Opinion
United States v. Flood
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 4, 2011No. 10-4105PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRISCOE, Chief Judge.
Frances Flood was convicted by a jury in the United States District Court for the District of Utah of making false or misleading statements to auditors, securities fraud, perjury, and conspiracy to commit securities fraud. Flood filed post-trial motions in the district court asserting: (1) that her convictions for certain offenses were barred by the applicable statute of limitations; and (2) that she received ineffective assistance of counsel because her trial counsel labored under actual conflicts of interest. The district court denied these post-trial motions, and Flood…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. George Don GallowayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Claude C. Wild, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- United States v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. James R. Gallup, United States of America v. Darryl E. DukeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. BattlesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. AugustineCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. FloodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. StrohmCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.