Legal Opinion

Daniel v. Stinson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 14, 1934No. 10478PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

E. M. Daniel as next friend and natural guardian of bis infant son, Monroe Daniel, Aurice Daniel, and Mrs. Lula *702Daniel Hooks filed their petition praying that a deed to described land be canceled; and for general relief. The deed was executed by W. J. A. Fuqua to his daughter, Mrs. Alice Stinson. The grantor was in feeble health, having suffered a stroke of paralysis prior to the execution of the deed, and was of the advanced age of 75 years. The deed contained a clause reserving to himself and his wife, Mrs. Lizzie Fuqua, “the right of possession, custody, and control and all profits to be…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hadaway v. HadawaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. Allen v. BemisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  3. Dobbs v. First National Bank of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  4. Hall v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  5. Plowden v. PlowdenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API