Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Conner v. Mahajan

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 5, 2017No. 17-1162PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

After losing his job at Mutual Bank, Kenneth Conner brought this qui tam action claiming that the defendants, most of them directors or officers of the bank, had defrauded the government in violation, of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733. The United States declined to take over the qui tam action, which Conner eventually settled. But the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation filed its own lawsuit against many of the same defendants. That case also settled, and Conner thinks he is ¡entitled to a share of the settlement proceeds the FDIC received from the defendants. To that end…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. EscobarSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. Stoner v. Santa Clara County Office of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Matrix IV, Inc. v. American Nat. Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. Bernstein v. BankertCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  5. Dexia Credit Local v. RoganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Rivera v. GuevaraDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. In re RanieriUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
  3. Cunningham v. Roundy's Illinois, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
  4. Davis v. BaldwinDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2021
  5. Gaddis v. DeMatteiDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2022

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API