Squires v. Martin
Coshocton Circuit Court
Error to the court of common pleas of Coshocton county. Swans Treatise (16 ed.) 16, 35 ; Bruder v. Biehl, 1 Circ. Dec. 51 (1 R. 85); Sec. 6565 Rev. Stat.; Reonard v. Cincinnati, 26 Ohio St. 447» second syllabus; Baer v. Otto, 34 Ohio St. 11, second syllabus (opinion 15); Bancroft v. Talbott, 29 Ohio St. 538; and see Barto v. Abbe, 16 Ohio 408, and State v. Wood, 22 Ohio St. 537.
1Opinion of the CourtAlbaugh, J.
The case of Emma E. Squires, plaintiff in error, against Joseph Martin, administrator of the estate of Martha Simpson, deceased, defendant in error, is an action brought by the plaintiff against the defendant, Joseph Martin, as such administrator, before William Hickson, justice of the peace of Jackson township, Coshocton county, and was tried to a jury, March 26, 1891, resulting in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff and judgment for costs.
Upon the trial before the justice the defendant, Martin, moved to dismiss the action, “on the ground that the plaintift’s bill of particulars does…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bancroft & Co. v. TalbottOhio Supreme Court · 1876