Legal Opinion

Niemiec v. Allegheny County Port Authority

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 27, 1973No. Appeals, Nos. 406 and 412PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Packer, J.,

The appellee disregarded a posted notice, “Bridge Closed to all Pedestrians”, just as he and many others had done almost daily for ten years. Only this time the appellee did not reach the other side. He fell thirty-five feet through the public walkway when he stepped over a hole created by a missing board onto a rotten or loose board.

The appellee sued the Port Authority, the owner of the trolley bridge, for the injuries resulting from his fall. The Port Authority then joined the City as an additional defendant, claiming that it was solely liable because it had contracted…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Holton v. GibsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Dougherty v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bacsick v. BarnesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. De Gregoris v. Stockwell Rubber Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Ammerman v. LushSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Marshall v. Port AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Marshall v. Port AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API