Legal Opinion

State v. Carlos Bolvito (071493)

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 31, 2014No. A-44-12PublishedCited by 123 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Patterson

In 2005, the Legislature established the Sex Crime Victim Treatment Fund (SCVTF) to defray the cost of counseling and treatment services for the victims of certain sex offenses and their families. N.J.S.A. 52:4B-43.2. To fund the services, the Legislature enacted N.J.S.A. 2C:14-10, which imposes upon defendants convicted of enumerated sex offenses a monetary penalty from a nominal amount to a specific maximum amount based upon the degree of the offense. The statute does not set forth the factors that a sentencing court should consider when imposing an SCVTF penalty. N.J.S.A. 2C:14-10.

This…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. RothSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. State v. YarboughSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  4. State v. BlackmonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  5. Jersey Central Power & Light Co. v. Melcar Utility Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by123 opinions

  1. L.A. and Horace Mann Insurance Company v. Board of Education of the City of Trenton, Mercer County (073401)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
  2. State v. Shaquille A. Nance State v. Taja L. Willis Bolton State v. Alvin D. Williams(076626)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
  3. Imo Registrant N.B. (073613)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
  4. State v. A.T.C.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
  5. STATE IN the INTEREST OF D.M., a JuvenileSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2019

118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API