Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Wright

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided May 2, 2022No. 3:22-cv-00026Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION MICHAEL DERRICK ALEXANDER, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:22-CV-26-JD-MGG JEREMY WRIGHT, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Michael Derrick Alexander, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a complaint against ten separate defendants. ECF 1. “A document filed pro se is to be liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however inartfully pleaded, must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.” Erickson v. Pardus,

551 U.S. 89, 94

(2007) (quotation marks and citations omitted).…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. George v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  5. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API