Legal Opinion

William Q. Boyce, Individually and as of the Will and Estate of Ida Mae Boyce, Deceased v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 13, 1968No. 370-66PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This case was referred to Trial Commissioner Mastin G. White with directions to make findings of fact and recommendation for conclusions of law under the order of reference and Rule 57 (a). The commissioner has done so in an opinion and report filed on February 8, 1968. Exceptions to the commissioner’s opinion, findings and recommended conclusion of law were filed by plaintiff and the case has been submitted to the court on oral argument of plaintiff, pro se, and of counsel for defendant and the briefs of the parties. The major issue in this case is governed by the “claim of right”…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. North American Oil Consolidated v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. James v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Healy v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. United States v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Patrick McGuirl, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935

4Cited by16 opinions

  1. Estate of Gardner v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984
  2. Hope v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
  3. Casalina Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973
  4. Lemly v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973
  5. Rosefsky v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API