Legal Opinion
Ron Thronson, Tom Luce and Michelle Crenshaw v. Martin Meisels and Miriam Meisels
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 28, 1986No. 85-2322PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Defendants-appellants Martin and Miriam Meisels appeal a judgment which was entered against them by the district court in accordance with the jury’s verdict. The Meiselses seek to set aside the verdict arguing that it is unsupported by the evidence. In the alternative, they contend that they are entitled to a new trial on grounds that the district court erred in admitting certain evidence over their objections. We affirm.
I
Plaintiffs-appellees Ron Thronson, Tom Luce and Michelle Crenshaw (the “plaintiffs”) brought this action against the Meis-elses alleging…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Stephen Roderick McRaeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Frank Coughlin, Padre Concrete Corporation, A. W. Van Cleave, Jr. And Allied Crushed Stone Company v. Capitol Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- William J. Benson v. Robert H. AllphinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- E.J. Wilson, Dearest Davis, and Cassandra Linder, Plaintiffs v. Roland AttawayCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Donald YARBROUGH, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TOWER OLDSMOBILE, INC., and Neil Burgess, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. M.S.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Michelle Rosenfeld v. Gerard Basquiat, as Administrator of the Estate of Jean-Michel BasquiatCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Joseph KellyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- James Gooden v. Michael v. NealCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. YangCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.