Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Scofield

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 22, 1968No. 2 CA-CR 95Published

1DissentKrucker, Judge

I dissent. I cannot agree with the view of the majority opinion.

This appeal presents for our review the defendant’s conviction of embezzlement, charged in the information as follows:

“That on or about the 4th day of August, 1966, and in Pima County, Arizona, and before the filing of this Information, the said JAMES I. SCOFIELD committed theft by embezzling from ECONOCAR INTERNATIONAL, INC. OF TUCSON, one 1966 Plymouth, Arizona License No. JMN-145, serial No. RH 41B61291071, all in violation of A.R.S. § 13-682(4) as amended, and § 13-688.”

The constitutional validity of A.R.S. § 13-682(4) was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. People v. McCaughanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. United States v. CardiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API