Hernandez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.
Rufino Hernandez appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion to quash service of process, claiming that the trial court erred in determining that the plaintiff had sufficiently complied with the statutory prerequisites for substituted service. We agree and reverse, because the allegations of the complaint concerning service were not sufficient to invoke substituted service over the appellant, and the plaintiff did not produce a return receipt for certified mail signed by the appellant in compliance with section 48.161, Florida Statutes.
Appellant was involved in an automobile accident…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Drake v. ScharlauDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Wyatt v. HaeseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Wiggam v. BamfordDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Mecca Multimedia, Inc. v. KurzbardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Alvarado v. CisnerosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hernandez v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Harrington III v. EWCO, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2022
- Pastrana v. Level Up Fitness LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2021