Legal Opinion

Prouty v. Heron

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 9, 1953No. 16590PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

Defendant in error was plaintiff in the trial court and we will herein refer to him as plaintiff. Plaintiffs in error were defendants in the trial court and we will hereinafter refer to them as defendants or board.

Plaintiff filed his complaint in the district court of the City and County of Denver, in which he sought to enjoin defendants from classifying qualified engineers as to specific branches of their profession and thereby limiting the practice of such engineers to those phases of the profession properly belonging to the classification in which such engineers were placed by the board.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. State Board of Dental Examiners v. SavelleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
  3. Chenoweth v. State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
  4. Sapero v. State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
  5. Abrams v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. People v. GallegosSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  2. Swisher v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  3. State Board of Technical Registration v. McDanielArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Asphalt Paving Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  5. Colorado Society of Community & Institutional Psychologists, Inc. v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API