Boyd v. Weiss
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert L. Brown, Justice.
This appeal arises out of a constitutional chaEenge to Act 48 of 1977, now codified at Ark. Code Ann. § 26-52-601 to -606 (Repl. 1997), which was effective on January 31, 1977. Act 48 permits residents of Texarkana, Arkansas, to pay an additional one percent sales tax in exchange for exemption from the state income tax. Under Act 48, border cities which are divided by a “street state Ene” are ehgible for this change in tax status. The stated purpose of Act 48 was to equalize the tax burden for residents in these border cities, thereby offering tax inducements to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Sullivan v. StroopSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Streight v. RaglandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- McCutchen v. HuckabeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Temco Construction, LLC v. GannSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
- Ghegan & Ghegan, Inc. v. BarclaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Hall v. TuckerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Arkansas Health Services Commission v. Regional Care Facilities, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Gallas v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.