Poke v. Peerless Foundry Co.

This is the second appeal in this case. Poke v. Peerless Foundry Company (1954), 124 Ind. App. 544, 119 N. E. 2d 905. In that case we remanded to the Industrial Board with instructions to determine and find whether the permanent partial impairment now complained of was a direct result of the first case of exposure for which he received compensation and afterwards returned to work, or was it the result of independent causes occurring after returning to work.

The finding and award of the Industrial Board in this case is, in part, as follows:

“That on the 12th day of November, 1948 the plaintiff…