Legal Opinion
State v. Hogue
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided June 15, 1971No. 4987PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
MARUMOTO, J.
Defendant was convicted after a jury trial in the circuit court of knowingly possessing marihuana in violation of HES § 329-5. The portion of the statute relevant to this case reads as follows:
“§ 329-5. Additional acts prohibited; penalty. No person shall knowingly plant, cultivate, produce, manufacture, possess, have under his control, prescribe, administer, or compound any narcotic drug as defined by section 329-1 except as provided in this chapter. Any person found guilty of any of the foregoing acts shall be imprisoned at hard labor not more than five…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. LealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. ReedSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Gonzales v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
- Reynolds v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- State v. EckrothSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. HironakaHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
- United States v. JeffersonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
- State v. HironakaHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. HogueHawaii Supreme Court · 1971