Legal Opinion

State v. Hogue

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1971No. 4987PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

MARUMOTO, J.

Defendant was convicted after a jury trial in the circuit court of knowingly possessing marihuana in violation of HES § 329-5. The portion of the statute relevant to this case reads as follows:

“§ 329-5. Additional acts prohibited; penalty. No person shall knowingly plant, cultivate, produce, manufacture, possess, have under his control, prescribe, administer, or compound any narcotic drug as defined by section 329-1 except as provided in this chapter. Any person found guilty of any of the foregoing acts shall be imprisoned at hard labor not more than five…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. LealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State v. ReedSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  3. Gonzales v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  4. Reynolds v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  5. State v. EckrothSupreme Court of Florida · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HironakaHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  2. United States v. JeffersonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
  3. State v. HironakaHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. HogueHawaii Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API