Legal Opinion

Capek v. Demetrowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 28, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order denying plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The form of the denials is fatally defective. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 261; D. & G. Girl Coat Co., Inc., v. Kafka, 218 App. Div. 607; affd., without opinion, 245 N. Y. 646.) In our opinion the plaintiff was also entitled to summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Therefore, no leave to amend the answer is granted. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Johnston…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. D. & G. Girl Coat Co. v. KafkaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  2. D. G. Girl Coat Co., Inc. v. ZabelickyNew York Court of Appeals · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Burr v. Carvel Dari-Freeze Stores, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1959
  2. City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. B. W. Construction Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API