Legal Opinion

Henry E. Meeker, Surviving Partner, Etc. v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 13, 1914No. 1000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

234 U.S. 749

34 S.Ct. 674

58 L.Ed. 1576

HENRY E. MEEKER, Surviving Partner, etc., Petitioner,

v.

LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY.

No. 1000.

HENRY E. MEEKER, Petitioner,

v.

LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY.

No. 1001.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 13, 1914

Mr. Wm. A. Glasgow, Jr., for petitioner.

No counsel appeared for respondent.

2Per curiam

1

Petitions granted, upon the authority of § 262 of the Judicial Code [36 Stat. at L. 1162, chap. 231, U. S. Comp. Stat. Supp. 1911, p. 235]. Re Chetwood, 165 U. S. 443, 462, 41 L. ed. 782, 788, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 385; Whitney v. Dick, 202 U. S. 132, 50 L. ed. 963, 26 Sup. Ct.…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McClellan v. CarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. In Re ChetwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Whitney v. DickSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. United States v. BeattySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. City of Lewiston v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Spiller v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Union Pacific Railroad v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API