Legal Opinion
Anderson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 14, 1985No. Appeal Nos. 84-1535, 84-1692PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BENNETT, Circuit Judge.
These consolidated cases1 are on appeal from the decisions of the United States Claims Court, dated June 6 and August 7, 1984, granting a partial motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Anderson v. United States, 5 Cl.Ct. 573 (1984); Foote v. United States, No. 343-84C (Cl.Ct. August 7, 1984) (unpublished order); Halleran v. United States, No. 392-84C (Cl.Ct. August 7, 1984) (unpublished order). We affirm.
BACKGROUND
The case on appeal consists of five consolidated actions brought under the Back Pay Act, 5 U.S.C. § 5596 (1982), by 56 current and former…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- South Corporation and Seal Fleet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- Joseph C. Spagnola, Jr. v. David Stockman, Director, Office of Management and BudgetCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Ellis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bevevino v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Dawson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Dawson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Ronald G. Anderson, Daniel W. Coffey, George Mercurio, and Edward P. Smith v. The United States, Robert R. Foote and William J. Halleran, III v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985