Legal Opinion

General Shoe Corp. v. Hood

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 5, 1970No. 45083Published

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Judge.

General Shoe Corporation, a judgment creditor, levied on land belonging to Peterson, and appellant Angie Hood filed her claim to the land in a former action (Hood v. General Shoe Corp., 121 Ga. App. 90 (173 SE2d 127)), the-creditor contesting on grounds, among others, that the deed from Peterson to Hood was void as an effort to defraud creditors. The creditors also filed general demurrers to the-claim as follows: “1. Plaintiff in attachments demurs generally in that said claim does not show a valid claim against the property levied upon. 2. Plaintiff in attachment demurs generally…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. Northern Assurance Co. v. AlmandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  3. Hood v. General Shoe Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  4. Mize v. MizeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API