Legal Opinion

Rounds v. State Industrial Com.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 10, 1932No. 23366PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCullison, J.

This is an original proceeding before this court to review an order of the State Industrial Commission made and entered February 5, 1932. Said order, omitting caption, is in words and figures as follows, to wit:

“Order.
“Now, on this 5th day of February, 1932, the State Industrial Commission being regularly in session, this cause comes on in its regular order for consideration pursuant to hearing had at Tulsa, Okla., on the 12th day of January, 1932, before Commissioner Fred H. Fannin on motion for revivor of action ; at which hearing, Mayme Rounds, exec utrix, appeared in person and by her…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lahoma Oil Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Ray v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Western Indemnity Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Swatek Construction Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Washabaugh v. Bartlett Collins Glass Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Parkhill Truck Co. v. EmerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Parker v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Black Gold Petroleum Co. v. HirshfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API