Legal Opinion

Love v. Harris

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 27, 1911PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Justice, J., at January Term, 1911, of Pas-quotaNK. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion of tbe Court by Mr. Justice Walicer.

1Opinion of the Court

"Walker, J.

This action was brought to recover damages of tbe defendant for failure to comply with a bid made by tbe plaintiff at a sale, under a power contained in a mortgage to bim. On 9 January, 1905, Richard Harris and wife executed to tbe defendant, Caleb Harris, a mortgage on land, to secure tbe payment of a certain indebtedness, with power of sale in case of default by tbe said Richard Harris in tbe payment of the debt. On 21 December, 1909, tbe mortgagor having failed *90to pay tbe debt, tbe defendant advertised tbe land for sale, under and by virtue of tbe power vested in bim by tbe deed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Baltzen v. . NicolayNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Mayer v. . AdrianSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  3. Leroy v. Jacobosky.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. Barnard v. DuncanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
  5. Davis v. . MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pike v. Wachovia Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Raper v. Oliver House, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  3. Smith v. . JoyceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Intertex, Inc. v. Cowden, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
  5. Clearman v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API