Legal Opinion

Dahl v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1923No. Appeal, No. 112Published

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff sued to recover damages for the death of her husband. The court below entered a compulsory nonsuit, which it subsequently refused to take off and this appeal followed.

The facts in brief are these: Adolph M. Dahl, the husband, while crossing the tracks of defendant company at a grade crossing at Verona Station, on September 16, 1920, intending to take the 7:30 a. m. train to Pittsburgh, the place of his employment, was struck and killed by an engine to which was attached a caboose car, ■preceding the train on which deceased purposed becoming a passenger. The witnesses…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lynn v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Weisenberg v. Lackawanna & Wyoming Valley R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API