Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Gammons

U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided June 19, 1998No. CGCMS 24127; Docket No. 1078Published

1ConcurrenceKantor, Judge

In U.S. v. Gammons, 47 M.J. 766 (C.G.Ct.Crim.App.1997), I concurred with Chief Judge Baum on the need for a rehearing on sentence. I did so based upon my belief that the record evidenced plain error when the trial counsel not only introduced evidence of prior nonjudieial punishment at the sentencing phase of the court-martial covering offenses the defendant had just been convicted of earlier in the proceeding, but also later commented upon that evidence in his sentencing argument in an obvious attempt to' increase the punishment. Furthermore, based upon my reading of the record, I was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. United States v. PierceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  3. United States v. GammonsU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
  4. United States v. ThompsonArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API