Holliman v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
1. Special grounds 1 and 2 of the motion for a new trial, not having been unqualifiedly approved by the trial judge, can not be considered by this court. Cronic v. State, 40 Ga. App. 444 (2), 445 (2) (150 S. E. 429), and cit.
2. The 3d special ground of the motion alleges that the court erred in admitting, over the objection of the movant, the following material evidence: “I later found out that that was a bale of cotton left there by Mr. Holliman. I found out it went there in his name. I got that information from Mr. Cook.” The objection urged to the admission of this testimony was that “it…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Herndon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- Cronic v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
3Cited by3 opinions
- Holliman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
- Austin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- McNatt v. Greyhound Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964