Legal Opinion

Manhattan Land & Fruit Co. v. Buras

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided February 12, 1942No. 131PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAILLOUET, District Judge.

This action was instituted by the Manhattan Land & Fruit Company, a corporation citizen of the state of New York, joined by the Humble Oil & Refining Company, a corporation citizen of the state of Texas, and by Gulf Refining Company and Tide Water Associated Oil Company, both corporation citizens of the state of Delaware, against La-Plaq Realty Inc., a corporation citizen of Louisiana, and the heirs of Cyprien Napoleon Buras and his widow, all citizens of said state; subsequently, one of the defendants (made so by substitution for a deceased original defendant) was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. BuckSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Leiter Minerals, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1954
  2. United States v. BurasDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1970
  3. United States v. BurasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  4. Pavell v. BerwickDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1943
  5. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross and Chevron Oil Company, Additional Defendants-Appellants-Cross v. Leo Buras Jr., Defendants-Appellees-Cross v. Philibert Buras, Intervenors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API