Legal Opinion
Senville v. Madison
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 10, 2009No. 08-2005-cvPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
The plaintiffs appeal from a decision of the United States District Court for the District of Vermont (Sessions, J.). The plaintiffs seek fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, arising from claims against the administrators for the Federal Highway Administration (“FHWA”) and the Vermont Agency of Transportation (“VTrans”) in connection with the proposed construction of portions of the Chittenden County Circumferential Highway (“CCCH”) in Vermont. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, procedural history of the case, and issues presented…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Vito Milanese, Jr. And Suzanne Milanese v. Rust-Oleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Healey v. LeavittCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- United States v. $19,047.00 in United States Currency, Defendant-In-Rem, Parbottie Rodriguez, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
3Cited by5 opinions
- W. M. v. C. v. William Barr, U.S. Atty GenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Fiedler v. ColvinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Fernando Adalberto Galeas Miranda v. Raul Maldonado, Jr., in his official capacity as Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center, et al.District Court, E.D. New York · 2026
- W. M. v. C. v. William Barr, U.S. Atty GenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- W. M. v. C. v. William Barr, U.S. Atty GenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019