Legal Opinion

Newberger v. New York Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided July 24, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

These actions of assumpsit were heard in the superior court on the defendant’s demurrer to the amended declaration in each case. They are now before us on the plaintiff’s exception to the decision of that court sustaining the demurrer.

The same question is involved in both cases. The actions are brought by the insured’s executrix to recover certain disability benefits alleged to be due under two life insurance policies issued by the defendant. The provisions of the policies are identical except for the dates and amounts. It appears from the amended declarations that the first policy was taken…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brownstein v. New York Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
  2. Peek Estate v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. KincaidSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  2. Bennett Chevrolet Co. v. Bankers & Shippers InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1937
  3. New York Life Ins. Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Cullum v. New York Life Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API