Legal Opinion

People v. Quiles

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 9, 2009No. A119615PublishedCited by 1 opinion

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NEEDHAM, J.

Jason Quiles appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence imposed after a jury convicted him of multiple crimes. He contends (1) his constitutional rights were violated when the court imposed the upper term of sentence based on his prior juvenile adjudications; (2) testimony that Quiles told a nurse he was going to “have one of the witnesses smacked” improperly tainted the case against him; (3) his defense attorney provided ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to object to the prosecutor’s closing argument; and (4) the court should have severed a grand theft…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Cunningham v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. People v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. United States v. Shannon Wayne TigheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. People v. NguyenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. RosalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API