Legal Opinion

Phasung Baccam v. Sheriff Keith Ferguson

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 7, 2011No. 11-2150Unpublished

1Per curiam

Phasung Baccam appeals from the magistrate judge’s 1 order denying his request for appointed counsel in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Because the parties did not consent to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge, cf. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (upon consent of parties, magistrate may conduct any or all proceedings in civil matter and order entry of judgment in the case); Gleason v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 777 F.2d 1324, 1324 (8th Cir.1985) (magistrate’s decision is final and directly appealable if issued under authority of § 636(c); § 636(c) requires clear and unambiguous statement in record…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Helen M. GLEASON, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  2. Christopher R. Legear v. John A. Thalacker, Sued as John Thalacker Russell Behrends John Sissel Larry BrimeyerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Isidro Gonzalez-Ramirez, Also Known as ChongoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API